The Richmond Register

April 21, 2013

School board split over consent items

By Crystal Wylie
Register News Writer

MADISON COUNTY — A regular Madison County School Board meeting may last almost two hours or more, depending on how many students are featured in the monthly “showcase” or how many items are on the agenda.

During a meeting’s consent agenda, a group of items “routine in nature are presented to the board in time to review before the meeting and are approved in one motion,” board chair Mona Isaacs says at every meeting.

However, two items met opposition from board members John Lackey and Mary Renfro at Thursday’s board meeting: A technology plan and a “cost-neutral” position change in central office.

Typically, the consent agenda contains approvals for school trips, claims, leaves of absence or the superintendent’s personnel actions.

Renfro said she had not had enough time to review all the items.

“We’re still not getting the reports we need seven days in advance. It happened again this month. This is the third month in a row, and we’re still not getting it in a timely manner … For the ones that really want to see what’s going on, I need to have that ahead of time,” Renfro said.

The claims were sent to the board Friday afternoon, but the rest of the consent agenda items were not made available until Monday afternoon because of an oversight in operating the file-sharing program, said Superintendent Tommy Floyd.

“It's hard to vote when I’ve not had enough time to look at it,” said Renfro, who suggested they just not vote on the consent agenda Thursday night.

“We can’t do that,” Isaacs replied. “We must conduct the business of the board this evening … if there are specific items you’re uncomfortable with…”

Renfro said she was concerned with “different things and contracts that cost lots and lots of money.”

The consent item on the ratification of the “cost-neutral position” change in central office went through several votes before it passed 3-2.

The district saved about $36,000 in central office costs through position eliminations, Floyd said. “I gave the board a complete rationale from Mr. (Randy) Peffer. We broke down how we had eliminated a position in central office in administrative support. We also eliminated another assistant superintendent, which brings us down to three as a district.”

The recommendation is to add part of that savings to the salary of a part-time secondary instructional supervisor (for the five middle schools and two high schools) to make it a full-time position that would pay in the low $80,000s, said Dr. Kevin Hub, assistant superintendent in human resources.

Currently, the part-time position pays around $46,000, he said.

“The position was valuable enough that we thought it worth your consideration and its continuance,” Floyd said.

“The term ‘instructional supervisor’ just seems so amorphous, that it’s maybe something we could just do without,” Lackey said. “Save that extra $35,000. That’s the sort of thing that shouldn’t be put in the consent agenda. It should be put in something else where we can hash things out.”

“I think that’s what we’re doing right now. Discussing it,” Floyd replied.

He never received feedback from the board indicating the position change should not be on the consent agenda, the superintendent said.

“We have had conversations about this,” Isaacs said. The board members received an email a week or two ago about the details of the position, she said. “Everybody got a copy of it.”

Before it passed, Lackey suggested tabling the position change item and only Renfro offered her support. Isaacs, along with board members Becky Coyle and Beth Brock, voted against tabling the item.

The same three board members then voted to ratify the position change.

Later in the meeting, Floyd announced a second central office shift.

Chief Academic Officer Randy Peffer is leaving the district to take a position at the Kentucky Department of Education as a “turnaround specialist” in Jefferson County.

Peffer came to Madison County in 2006 and replaced Floyd, who was formerly the chief academic officer, the superintendent said. “I’ve met few people that care about kids more than Randy Peffer does.” Floyd said.

The district will seek a replacement for Peffer's position, said Erin Stewart, the district's community education director.

Another item Renfro wanted pulled out of the consent agenda was the District Technology Plan because “it had money written all over it,” she said. Lackey also wanted more explanation.

Floyd said the plan was “not a commitment for additional funds.”

The plan is used to report to state and federal governments about what the district is paying for technology, said Bob Moore, the district’s new technology director.

The district receives federal funding from a program that reimburses the school district close to $500,000 a year, he said.

“If we don’t submit this claim, we lose that federal funding. This is a nonbinding framework that we use to plan and implement technology in the district,” he said.

Lackey was satisfied with Moore’s explanation, and the motion carried to approve the technology plan.

Renfro also pointed out money fluctuations in the district’s claims.

However, those amounts are different each month, depending on when the bills are paid for fuel, food or bonds, for example, Floyd said. “There will always be things that go up and down.”

“These are bills that we owe that are being paid,” Isaacs explained. “It’s not a new obligation that the district is taking … it’s kind of like a checkbook register.”

Another item of concern for Renfro was the funding plans for a grant to increase the number of students who take advanced placement courses.

But this too was not a budget obligation, Floyd said. The program is totally grant-funded and there is no cost to the district, except for minimal classroom supplies.

Dropout age debate

The board was originally slated to vote on a policy change to raise the compulsory dropout age from 16 to 18 in response to new state legislation.

According to a provision of Senate Bill 97, once 55 percent of districts have adopted the policy, the remaining districts will have to sign on within four years.

The Kentucky Department of Education announced April 10 that the first 57 districts to approve the policy before the 2015-16 school year would each receive $10,000 in planning funds.

Although the board made plans to vote on the measure at Thursday’s meeting, the vote was shelved April 15. The district’s attorney advised the board to wait until the law goes into effect June 25.

“Any vote we take now can be challenged,” said Isaacs, who brought up the policy change again as “old business” Thursday.

She urged the community to think about the dropout change and contact their representatives on the school board about any concerns.

The district was able to reduce the number of dropouts to six students last year, Isaacs pointed out.

Good programs are already in place, she said. “If there is a district that is ready to take that on in the state of Kentucky, it’s Madison County.”

A 16-year-old “may not have all the tools they need yet to go out and meet the world,” she added.

But Lackey said the Kentucky Education Association “is very skeptical about this.”

He said teachers are concerned that the law “would be contributing to disruption in the classroom.”

The state Senate killed the (dropout age) proposal several times “because teachers didn’t want that,” Lackey said.

He also was concerned about the cost.

“These kids that don’t want to come to school, they want to drop out, we force them to come back — they are going to end up at Bellevue (Learning Center),” he said.

Brock said any opportunity to reach at-risk students “is an opportunity that we ought to take advantage of.”

By raising the compulsory age, she said, the district has more time to help students become successful.

“And if we had this (policy) in place last year, at most, the number of students we would have had to provide services to … would be six,” Isaacs said. There were 83 dropouts in 2006, she added.

Insurance broker selected

When the news broke in mid-January that the longtime school district insurer, Kentucky School Boards Insurance Trust, was dissolving, 174 districts began the search for new insurance providers.

Madison County Schools started a broker search last month with a committee of central office staff, Isaacs as the board representative and the superintendent.

The committee recommendation to hire Roeding Insurance Group and Roberts Insurance and Investments was approved 5-0.

The committee interviewed five brokers, whittled down from a list of what Isaacs estimated to be about 10 to 12 applicants.

They will procure fleet, general liability, educator’s legal liability, property, worker’s compensation and pollution insurance for the 2013-14 school year.

Renfro inquired about the cost.

There is no cost yet, Isaacs said. “It is the broker’s job to contact insurance carriers and underwriters and secure for us the coverage we need at the best cost.”

Floyd said the recommended brokers had a lot of experience with Kentucky school districts.

Crystal Wylie can be reached at or 623-1669, Ext. 6696.